Sunday 19 January 2014

"Mechanical Pencils": Finding Balance between Basics and Forward Thinking

Our school is launching an Ad Hoc Committee to plan our school's technology needs.   Jokingly or not, someone responded, "Mechanical pencils!" A few chortled at the response, and then we moved on. But the question remains.

When parents, community members, and business leaders express their woes about education, the back to basics concept is held up as a holy grail: Arithmetic, Reading, Writing, and perhaps Vocabulary, Spelling, Manners, Life Skills, and Penmanship.  I am not even sure I disagree with them,  Of course I want my children and students to be able to multiply in their heads and print legibly.  There must be room in 14 years of schooling (from JK to Grade 12) to ensure some degree of competence in such basic skills without compromising the rich, meaningful, personalized learning that has become the ideal in today's education.

I believe that we could find agreement among stakeholders about what basic skills are non-negotiable in the learning process.  In fact, many schools are developing exactly that: a "Non-negotiable" curriculum for each grade (Common Core in the US and Non-Negotiables in the UK). An infographic that captures such trends was compiled from a survey by Education Week. The danger of course is that a "back to basics" approach will fall into a "drill and kill" pattern, with some children falling short of mastery.  What about the value of student-centred exploration, project-based learning, interdisciplinary connections, differentiation, choice, and personalization?

Excerpt, "Teaching Well-being in Schools" from pioneer in Positive Psychology, Dr. Martin E. P. Seligman, full article can be read here.
First, a quiz: 
Question one: in one or two words, what do you most want for your children?If you are like the thousands of parents I’ve polled you responded, “Happiness,” “Confidence,” “Contentment,” “Fulfillment,” “Balance,” “Good stuff,” “Kindness,” “Health,” “Satisfaction,” “Love,” “Being civilized,” “Meaning,” and the like. In short, well-being is your topmost priority for your children. 
Question two: in one or two words, what do schools teach?If you are like other parents, you responded, “Achievement,” “Thinking skills,” “Success,” “Conformity,” “Literacy,” “Math,” “Work,” “Test taking,” “Discipline,” and the like. In short, what schools teach is how to succeed in the workplace.
Notice that there is almost no overlap between the two lists.
Yet parent would not want the so-called academic skills abandoned and often do not trust approaches to teaching that differ from the way they were taught.

The pendulum swings back and forth, and we need to find a balance.  Parents want their kids to come home excited about what they are learning.  Students who want to learn are more apt as pupils.  As long as we work from a belief that all kids can learn functional skills (barring neurological impairments) , the expertise of the teacher and school should be harnessed to recognize and facilitate students' personal learning readiness, providing an environment where all can thrive.

So, it is not a balance between back-to-basics (i.e. mechanical pencils) and innovative methodology (i.e. student blogs) that we need.   It is immersion in both, where each provides fuel for the other. 

Sunday 12 January 2014

Deeper Learning: Why are Students Hesitant to Use their Personal Passions in the Classroom Setting


Whether we are talking about personal devices, gamification, favourite books, or hobbies, why are students so hesitant to use their personal passions in the classroom setting?  It seems that there is a great divide between “school” and “personal” lives and students are often the ones patrolling the border.   More and more teachers understand the need for relevant, meaningful, authentic tasks to engage learners.  They are increasingly fluid in offering choice, differentiation, and personalization even in traditional learning environments.  Many are starting to incorporate “Passion-based Learning,” “Genius Hour,” or “20 Percent Learning” into their instructional time, where students get to pursue a personal passion and are given support, structure, and time to do so. Yet when offered such opportunities, only a minority truly run with it.  Some begrudgingly go through the motions (but without real buy-in), some resent the intrusion on their personal domain and resist, and others shrug it off and wait for the teacher to assign them something to do next. 

There is a perception that most students have personal passions that schools do not integrate.  Do these students dive into personal learning – LEGO, basketball, rocks, dance, skiing, camping, anime, trucks, hockey, horses, space, etc.?  If they are lucky, their families can foster their interests in the home environment.  Elementary and secondary classrooms give many free choices in reading selections, journal ideas, and project topics. Yet looking around at my elementary-aged children, their friends, and cousins, the majority of young people skim the surface of their varied interests. There is so much out there to learn.  There is great value in students having a broad base of knowledge and skills.  And there is constant temptation to emulate the passions of peers.  And it is so natural to become bored and lose interest. The learning for most does not go very deep.

The reality is that most students need to learn how to sustain and develop a passion.  They need to see depth modeled (by peers, by community members, by teachers, by public figures):
  • I want to learn about/how to ______________.
  • How do I learn best?
  • Why do I want to learn it?
  • What are my options?
  • How much time will it take?
  • What sacrifices am I willing to make?
  • Who can I talk to ?
  • Where can I turn?
  • What is the history of _______________?
  • Who else is learning _______________?
  • How can I use _______________ to make a difference?
  • … and so on. 

Ultimately, if we want young people to know how to learn, we need to place greater value on metacognitive skills.  We need to give students the language and a voice in the learning process (“this is hard, and I want to give up, but I will persist,” “this is a personal, and I am not ready to share it,” “I need more practice,” “I am ready to learn something new,”  “this is necessary even if tedious”). The most important lesson we can teach to all of our students is to recognize and name their learning and to guide students to become self-aware, honest, and deliberate as learners and as people.

Sunday 5 January 2014

First EdCamp Experience


On Saturday, January 4, 2014, I attended my first ever EdCamp from the comfort of my own home. EdCamp Home was the epitome of both the medium and the message.  I found myself impressed by the scale and scope of the event and wowed by the organizers who were creatively, fluidly, and miraculously keeping everything on track.

Since this is my first experience with an un-conference, I have no frame of reference for comparison.  For my first session, I joined a GHO on Incorporating Ed-Tech in schools where 1:1 is not available.  I agreed with my gathered colleagues that 1:1 is not a necessity and that Ed-Tech is not the goal, only another tool. I have heard (from blended learning PD) that the ideal ratio is 2:1, where students use tools collaboratively and interdependently. This is hard to believe.  A 1:1 ratio (and the bandwidth to support it): empower each student with 24/7 access to learning supports, provide all teachers with the impetus to develop their own competency and incorporate innovation into lessons, and a multitude of other benefits (See Nine Reasons 1:1 Learning is Revolutionizing Education by Alexy Kudashev).  

Most schools are not there yet.  Many schools (including mine) have out-of-date desktop computer labs, limited ethernet connections, prohibitive wi-fi bandwidth problems, students without internet access at home, and no present means or plans for changing these realities. Does that mean that these students and teachers are relegated to the sidelines and miss out on the endless educational benefits?  No way!

My first EdCamp Home session was much too short to arrive at any meaningful learning.  By the time everyone joined the Hangout, introductions were duly completed, and a few challenges were raised, time for the session was at an end.  No answers, no direction, not even a lead… Yet, when EdCamp Home ended, I registered for Google Classroom Connections, explored Virtual Field Trip options (that ironically require an Ethernet connection), and considered Flipped Classrooms (and in the process discovered the ideas Zack Blois posted on Blended Learning models in non 1:1 environments).

EdCamp Home was not what I expected, but it opened the door to my learning, decision-making, and problem solving. It was the medium and the message for modern learning.  Hmmm… Now I will have to check-out the video from the EdCamp Home session on applying the EdCamp model in a classroom.

Friday 3 January 2014

Responding to a Blogging Challenge



A few weeks ago I received the blogging challenge that has been making the rounds. I am new to blogging, but I am definitively seeking the opportunity to reflect publicly and grow (personally and professionally). So I am starting my blogging year with meeting this challenge.
Here’s how this blogging challenge works:
Acknowledge the nominating blogger. 
 Share 11 random facts about yourself.
 Answer the 11 questions the nominating blogger has created for you.
List 11 bloggers.

Post 11 questions for the bloggers you nominate to answer, and let all the bloggers know they have been nominated. Don’t nominate a blogger who has nominated you.

1. My nominating blogger:  Julie Balen
Here goes…
2.  Eleven Random Facts About Yana:
1. I have no memories before age 8.
2. I went to an Alternative High School in Toronto.
3. I attended high school with one of my favourite writers (Cory Doctorow).
4. I worked for CBC Radio and almost switched from teaching to a career in Radio.
5. I love downhill skiing (and miss it).
6. I am learning to play acoustic guitar.
7.  I think sleeping in a colossal waste of time (a.k.a. Nancy Kress Beggars series)
8. I speak Russian.
9.  I love Irish Coffee (even though I rarely have a good one).
10. Until Grade 5, I was the tallest person in my grade (then I stopped growing).
11. I believe that shared pain is lessened and shared joy multiplied.

3. The 11 questions Julie created for me:
 1. What does online learning mean for you? Freedom to learn how and when best meets my needs.
2. What makes you laugh? My youngest son singing his “Santa Claus song” every time he has a new audience – actions and all.
3.  Satellite vs. Netflix? Netflix on occasion
4. Movie or Novel? Novels and more time to read them.
5. Who is your favourite Canadian author? Currently, Cory Doctorow, but for always Michael Ondaatje
6. If you could go on vacation any where in the world, where would that be? I just came back from a wonderful trip of a lifetime, but I will go back to Florence one day.
7. Favourite wild flower? Devil’s Paintbrush
8. What educational event do you REALLY want to attend? “Reading for the Love of It Conference”
9. What is the one tech tool you cannot live without? none
10. Hottest educational trend/author for you right now. Google Apps
11 List three high points of 2013.
1.    My husband returning home after a long hospitalization.
2.   An incredible trip to Europe with my daughters and mother.
3.   For the first time ever, all of my children stayed up on New Year’s Eve (with dancing, games, snacks, bubbly pop, and midnight kisses)

4. My list of bloggers includes those who have encouraged me and those I hope to encourage:
Melanie Martilla
Kim Fahner
Jaclyn Calder
Marcie Lewis
Kristen Mattson

Ryan Horne
Marc Poirier
Brendan Murphy
Andrea WilsonVazquez
Neely Powell
Maya Holson

5.  And my 11 questions for you are:
  1. What is something new you want to learn?
  2. What is a project you are currently working on that you plan to complete in the near future?
  3. What is a project you plan to start this year?
  4. What is your favourite musical memory?
  5. Describe a live performance your attended.
  6. Dogs or cats? Why?
  7. If you were an animal, which one would you be?
  8. Who/What inspires you?
  9. Realism / Surrealism / Abstract / Other?
  10. What do you do to stay fit?
  11. How do you get through difficult days?